Quality management as a toolbox not a tick-box
In this blog, Caroline Campbell explores moving beyond tick‑box assurance to a quality toolbox, championing practical, human‑centred approaches that build capability, embed ownership, and enhance the student experience across the institution.
Please note the views expressed in this article are the opinion of the author.
Background
Dreaming, Disrupting and Re‑imagining Quality in Higher Education
Quality in higher education is often discussed with a mix of respect and apprehension. Respect, because we know the profound responsibility we carry for designing transformative learning experiences. Apprehension, because quality processes can sometimes feel like they exist to satisfy external requirements rather than support everyday practice.
This perception, of quality as scrutiny, burden or audit, misses the point.
Because quality is not a tick-box.
Quality is a toolbox.
A tick-box represents compliance: a narrow, transactional moment in time.
A toolbox represents capability: a set of adaptive, practical resources that help people do their best work.
Shifting our sector from tick-box thinking to toolbox culture requires us to rethink how we talk about, design and live quality every day.
I am a Dreamer: Reimagining the Purpose of Quality
I believe in transforming the quality landscape in higher education by democratising quality principles and skills.
In an interview at 23 years old, I blurted out to my CEO that his change programme wasn’t working, that colleagues didn’t really know it existed, we weren’t bought in and didn’t see the value. I had no idea that the world of organisational change or quality management existed, yet somehow, I understood the power of engagement for driving real change. Over the next year I was introduced to Creative Problem Solving (CPS v6.1) and Facilitation techniques and I’ve spent the last 20 years honing these skills and applying them in a variety of sectors, all whilst holding the principles of Fair Process – Engagement, Explanation and Expectation Clarity within my professional core values.
At Nottingham Trent University (NTU), compliance with regulatory conditions should be a natural by-product of strong practice, not the motivation behind it.
Yes, the shift to outcomes-based regulation, under the Office for Students, elicits concern for some, but within this shift lies enormous opportunity to:
- Design processes that genuinely work for our institution, aligned with our vision, values and strategy
- Empower colleagues with practical quality and problem-solving skills that enhance rather than add to workload
- Harness diverse expertise and creativity across the university
- Replace rigid procedures with shared goals and intelligent flexibility.
Quality management, when understood and applied well empowers staff, strengthens collaboration, enhances student experience, and builds trust with external partners.
Our new Course Review Policy is an early example of this shift: setting minimum requirements rather than prescribing uniform processes, creating space for schools and course teams to shape review activity in ways that genuinely add value. Schools have the freedom to explore the data and develop these learning points in a way that meets their needs whilst presenting the outputs of their activities in a consistent manner through the Course Review Plan and annual school level report to enable cross organisation governance.
The role of CADQ is to provide schools with the quality management and problem-solving tools to look beyond the basic data to explore the root cause and then to provide Educational Development and Academic and Professional Practice support to deliver solutions. Our value is in setting out the foundation process, supporting schools to use it to their benefit and reviewing processes to ensure they are fit for purpose.
I am a Disruptor: empowering people to own and drive everyday quality.
I am committed to challenging the long-held idea that “quality lives in the centre” or a single department. It doesn’t. And it shouldn’t. By equipping those at the heart of our service delivery, with the tools and understanding to embed quality into their everyday practice, we can empower those that can make a real difference to do so.
Real quality, the kind that improves courses, enriches student experience, and supports meaningful change, lives with the people who design, deliver, support and review our learning environments every day.
That is why my focus is on equipping course leaders and academic support teams with the tools, understanding and confidence to embed quality into their daily practice. Not as a compliance task, but as a driver of continual innovation. My role, and the role of every quality professional, should be to support, coach and empower, not to gatekeep.
That means:
- helping colleagues ask the right questions; introducing problem-solving techniques and tools that are accessible and meaningful
- providing simple, effective frameworks; co-designing processes and policy that remove friction and waste
- building capability instead of dependence.
We need to share core skills around problem solving, such as Five Whys, Ishikawa’s Fishbone diagram and Pareto Analysis. We need to create an environment where colleagues feel confident highlighting issues and can find support and advice to resolve them rather than fearing they will be judged or condemned for not hitting the mark.
If we do this well, something transformative happens: people feel ownership and we turn the traditional model on its head. Together, we can co-create a culture where quality, creativity and education go hand in hand, always with the student experience at the centre.
I am a Believer: people-powered quality not quality powered people.
I believe in a future where we design systems that serve people, empower best practice, and genuinely improve student outcomes. There is no one size fits all within quality management and process design, just like no standardised course structure achieves success for all students.
We invest time and energy into providing course pedagogy and scaffolding which enables students to learn in a way that best suits their strengths and needs. I believe that the HE sector will achieve positive outcomes for our students, not through standardised tick-box processes but through providing a scaffolded quality toolbox for colleagues, just as we do for students.
Together, we can build a culture where quality is not something we ‘have to do,’ but something we are proud to do because it helps us deliver the best possible experience for our students, in ways that work for our colleagues and our university.
Where quality is:
- understood by everyone
- owned by everyone
- lived by everyone
Because you are given the skills, understanding and support to make it work for you.
By implementing process mapping across the organisation for example we can understand areas of duplication, reliance and impact in our ways of working. Identify areas of conflicting priorities or superfluous activity and use Quality Management principles to reduce workload and improve results.
Quality should never be the job of one team. It thrives when everyone across the institution feels ownership and when academics, professional services, students, and partners see quality enhancements as part of their everyday practice.
This is the transformation I am dreaming of.
This is the disruption I am leading.
And this is the future I believe NTU is ready to create.
Author information
Caroline Campbell is a Collaborations and Partnerships Senior Standards and Quality Advisor in the Centre for Academic Development & Quality. If you would like to learn more about Creative Problem Solving, Process Mapping or Facilitation Support please contact Caroline via LinkedIn or email.
More CADQ blogs
Transforming Communications: How we are developing communications as a professional services department in Higher Education
Sarah Harwood shares how CADQ, a professional services department at NTU, is developing its communications and how small changes, such as the adoption of simple writing techniques, can make a big impact.
Enriching Student Learning Through Online Discussions: Evidence-Based Best Practices
In this blog Elena Khabarova, Learning Designer, explores the benefits of online discussions, shares strategies for making them effective, and provides guidance on how you can implement them successfully in your teaching practice.
Project Management in Higher Education: Bolstering yourself (and your projects) against sector changes
Amy Manktelow explores how to navigate Project Management within Higher Education.